
This week the US Supreme Court upended a 100-year precedent that made it more difficult for politicians to be influenced or financed by corporations. This week Dave Zirin of The Nation wrote about the possibility of the NFL being granted "single entity" status by the same court (if the case gets there). According to Zirin "the NFL's collective bargaining agreement expires in March 2011. There will be no salary cap or salary floor in the league if a new deal isn't reached by March 5, 2010. If the Supreme Court rules that the NFL is a single entity, that changes the way the league negotiates--or doesn't negotiate--with the players. Teams could slash payroll, violate labor law, and the NFL Players Association would have no recourse."
Though players in the NFL presumably make much more money than anyone in our class at the moment each year, consider the notion of the athlete or athletic body as a commodity. If an athlete is a laborer how can we use Karl Marx's concepts of class, capitalist, and proleteriet to describe the relationship that exists within the NFL between players, owners, and the NFL? Depending on your location in the sport involvement model, where do you fit into this relationship as consumer of sport? How would your sport experience change if the NFL can be treated as a single entity? Relate this to Michael Moore or George Sage's explanation and critique of capitalism and the "commodified sports industry" (152).
Please post your response as a comment so that it is easier for everyone to see this original posting.